Digital Storytelling Inservice materials

Template for an “I am From” poemIAmFromTemplae

Template for Monica Hogan’s place poem (template created by Monica) Kansas is

 

 

Ignite & Play: Thinking in a Gaming Habit of Mind (2014 CCCC presentation, session F.09)

betterworldPdf of  handout & presentation slides           F09–FitzpatrickHandout

presentation slides: F09Fitzpatrick
session handout 4c14handout

Coming Fall 2013

Special Topics: Humor & Literature

for more information, contact Maureen Fitzpatrick at mfitzpat@jccc.edu

ENGL 292  * Sec 350 * CRN 80902 * Online course

“Like a welcome summer rain, humor may suddenly cleanse and cool the earth, the air and you.” – Langston Hughes

In the ENGL 292 Special Topics section “Humor and Literature,” students will investigating the role of the wit, jest and buffoonery in society; explore the cultural effects of gentle, broad and subversive comedy; and theorize about exactly what “funny” is.  In this online class, students will engage with written and performed texts to study the elements that create humor as well as contemplate what it is that different instances of comedy reveal about the creator, audience and their culture.

Featuring:

  • Northanger Abbey by Jane Austen
  • The Code of the Woosters by P.G. Wodehouse
  • Catch 22 by Joseph Heller
  • A Confederacy of Dunces by John Kennedy Toole

Additional writings and performances by:

  • William Shakespeare
  • Oscar Wilde
  • George Carlin
  • James Thurber
  • Geoffrey Chaucer
  • Mark Twain
  • Langston Hughes
  • Dorothy Parker
  • Richard Pryor
  • Will Rogers
  • and many others . . .

Determiner cheat sheet

Determiners: those silly little words that are so hard to define and, if English is not your first language in particular, can be so difficult to use correctly. Determiners are technically adjectives, but they contain so much hard-to-describe information they are often discussed as a class of words themselves

Determiners are a class of words that precede nouns and can indicate many things:

  • Whether the noun being introduced is a general noun (“A dog was barking”—which dog? Just “a” dog. Any old dog.)  or if the noun being introduced refers to a specific incarnation of that noun (“The dog was barking”—which dog? The specific dog we both know we are talking about.).
  • Whether the noun being introduced is singular (“Each person wanted that cookie” or plural “All the children wanted some cookies”)
  • Whether the noun being introduced is at hand or at a distance (“These buttons [close] go on those shirts [far]”)
  • Whether the noun being introduced is owned or possessed (“My fears and his dreams were realized.”)
  • Whether the noun being introduced does or does not exist (“He want to know what question had no answer.”).

Types of determiners

 

Occurs with singular count nouns

Occurs with plural count nouns

Occurs with noncount* nouns

TYPE 1

yes

yes

yes

themy, his, her, etc.

no

any

what, which

 

the dogmy dog


no dog

any dog

what dog

 

the dogsmy dogs


no dogs

any dogs

what dogs

the milkmy milk


no milk

any milk

what milk

TYPE 2

no

yes

Yes

no determinersome

enough

 


dog
some dog

enough dog


dogs
some dogs

enough dogs


milk
some milk

enough milk

TYPE 3

yes

no

Yes

this, that  this dog, that dog this dogs, that dogs this milk, that milk
TYPE 4

no

yes

No

these, those  these dog, those dog these dogs, those dogs these milk, those milk
TYPE 5

yes

no

No

a(n)
each, every
(n)either
a dog, an eagleeach dog, every dog

either dog

a dogs, an eagleseach dogs, every dogs

neither dogs

a milk
each milk
, every milk

either milk

*a noncount count is a noun that is both singular and plural at once (for example, furniture or milk); noncount nouns do not require a determiner: “We like milk” is allowed, but “We like dog” is not.

testing

Major Narrative Threads in The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks

Sentence Diagramming & Computers

A sentence diagrammed using the Kellogg-Reed method.

Can you read this? If you were in elementary school after the 1960s, maybe not.

Chances are, if you went to elementary school before 1970 (or attended a Catholic school before 1985), you remember diagramming sentences. One by one, you would be called up to the board to have your skills and nerve tested. You’d be given a sentence, and all you’d have to do was dissect—right there, immediately, flawlessly—in front of a class full of your peers and the hovering teacher. A ritual of childhood that, it turns out, taught many children only one thing about grammar: to hate it.

However, if you are one of those diagramming-loving freaks, have a long-lost need to revisit sources of pain from your childhood, or just want to kill a few minutes trying to outsmart a computer, you might want to visit the online Kellogg-Reed Diagrammer at http://1aiway.com/nlp4net/services/enparser/

Because this is a computer and not an intelligent being, of course, the program is not difficult to stump. Sometimes failing to insert a comma after an introductory clause or putting too many “cleft” structures in a row (as in “There was a boy who sang”) will result in the message “Cannot find an utterance,” as though you have literally left it speechless. It has lax standards—it will diagram “She pinked the dress,” correctly guessing that “pink” is being used here as a verb, but it will not diagram “After the meeting, it slowly walked away.”

Most often, it will generate multiple potential diagrams for the user—this is a computer, after all. It doesn’t speak English, only binary. When I input the sentence “The boy cried until he finally fell asleep” the parsing program incorrectly identified “fell” as the main verb in its first two offerings; only on the third did it realize that “cried” was the actual beginning of the predicate. And even when the diagrammer gives you many choices, there is no guarantee that any of them are correct. For example, when I typed in “Once upon a time, there was a dragon knitting sweaters for stray dogs, and he opened a yarn store with his friend, a unicorn named Fred,” the website gave me a whopping 24 possible diagrams. None of them were quite right.